Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
Priscilla Everette-Oates v. Lolita Chapman
as 20-1093
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLEOD, Director, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity, NORTH CAROLINA STATE AUDITOR, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SBI AGENT LOLITA CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity, SHARON EDMUNDSON, in her individual capacity, BETH WOOD, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRISCILLA EVERETTE-OATES
Plaintiff:
DUARTHUR OATES
Brian Davison v. Phyllis Randall
as 17-2003
Amicus Curiae:
REBECCA TUSHNET, Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School, HELEN L. NORTON, Professor and Ira C. Rothgerber, Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law, University of Colorado School of Law, ACLU OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Defendant:
LEO P. ROGERS, In his official capacity, RON MEYER, In his official capacity, TONY BUFFINGTON, In his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN DAVISON
Defendant / Appellee:
PHYLLIS RANDALL, In her official and individual capacity and LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, In their official and individual capacities
Charles Thomas v. South Carolina DOC
as 15-7001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, Former Prison Director, MEDICAL DIVISION and others
Defendant:
BUDGET CONTROL and SOUTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT, In their indvidual and official capacities
Mark McBurney v. Nathaniel Young
as 11-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK J. MCBURNEY and ROGER W. HURLBERT
Plaintiff:
BONNIE STEWART, Professor
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, Deputy Commissioner and Director, Division of Child Support Enforcement, Commonwealth of Virginia and THOMAS C. LITTLE, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia and SAMUEL A. DAVIS, Real Estate Assessment Division, Henrico County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Amicus Curiae:
THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWS EDITORS, ASSOCIATION OF CAPITOL REPORTERS AND EDITORS and others
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Douglas Gansler
as 13-1994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General, Maryland Department of State Police, CHRISTOPHER ESNES, LT. RANDY L. STEPHENS and others
Chante' Hodge v. Randy Stephen
as 13-1419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANTE' N. HODGE and HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY L. STEPHENS, individual and government capacity, SEARGENT MERKELSON, (MSP), individual and government capacity, SEARGENT BEACH, individual and government capacity and others
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Board of County Commissioner
as 10-2290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, BARBARA A. STINNETT, Commissioner, in her individual capacity and official capacity, LINDA KELLEY, Commissioner, in her individual capacity and official capacity and others
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County
as 09-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR. and CHANTE' N. HODGE, Mrs.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT COUNTY, (local government), STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND STATE TREASURER and others
Omar Pearson v. State of North Carolina
as 08-6332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR DEMITRIOUS PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Local Government and MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
