Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Natalia Wallace v. Mary Baldwin University
as 23-2247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIA R. WALLACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY
Tyrone Wallace v. Erving
as 22-6048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE R. WALLACE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERVING, GAINER, LIEUTENANT GRUNDY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MOODY, Transportation Officer, JOHN DOE, Lieutenant - compound officer and THE RESPONSE TEAM
Tyrone Wallace v. Officer N. Henning
as 21-7207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE R. WALLACE
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MOODY, Transportation Officer
Defendant:
ERVING, GAINER, N. HENNING, Unit Officer and others
Malcolm Muhammad v. Chaplain Jackson
as 15-7294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. REID
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN JACKSON
Defendant:
EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity, R. WALLACE, individually and official capacity and WENDY S. HOBBS, individually and official capacity
Malcolm Muhammad v. Chaplain Jackson
as 15-7294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. REID
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAPLAIN JACKSON
Defendant:
EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity, R. WALLACE, individually and official capacity and WENDY S. HOBBS, individually and official capacity
Albert Randolph v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-7654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden-Chief, KEITH DAWKINS, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4, R. WALLACE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Albert Randolph v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-7447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden-Chief, KEITH DAWKINS, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4, R. WALLACE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
US v. Cruso Wallace
as 09-7530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRUSO R. WALLACE
US v. Wallace
as 07-7160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRUSO R. WALLACE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
