Cases 1 - 10 of 21
David Meyers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 23-6800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Israel Rydie v. Joseph Biden
as 21-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISRAEL RYDIE and ELIZABETH FLEMING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
David Shipp v. Eric Hargan
as 20-1615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. SHIPP
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC HARGAN, Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-1215
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
ARKANSAS, SOUTH CAROLINA, ALABAMA and others
HIAS, Inc. v. Donald Trump
as 20-1160
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, CHAD WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE, INC., CHURCH WORLD SERVICE, INC. and HIAS, INC.
In re: American E-Liquid
as 19-2242
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, NORMAN E. SHARPLESS, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Appellant:
ARIZONA SMOKE FREE BUSINESS ALLIANCE, AMERICAN VAPING ASSOCIATION, OHIO VAPOR TRADE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, TRUTH INITIATIVE, LEAH BRASCH and others
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL SIEGEL, STATE OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
American Academy of Pediatrics v. FDA
as 19-2198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, TRUTH INITIATIVE, MARYLAND CHAPTER- AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SCOTT GOTTLIEB, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
In re: Cigar Association
as 19-2130
Intervenor:
SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES TRADE ASSOCIATION- TEXAS, NEW YORK STATE VAPOR ASSOCIATION, CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, LINDA GOLDSTEIN, MD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Appellant:
CIGAR RIGHTS OF AMERICA, PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION, f/k/a International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers Association and In re: CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HEALTH OFFICERS and STATE OF MARYLAND
American Academy of Pediatrics v. American E-Liquid
as 19-2132
Not Yet Classified:
RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, MARYLAND VAPOR ALLIANCE, IOWANS FOR ALTERNATIVE TO SMOKING AND TOBACCO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEAH BRASCH, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
