Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 103
US v. Eugene Watkins
as 24-6523
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EUGENE ROBERT WATKINS
US v. Juwan Watkins
as 24-6493
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUWAN ARMARNI WATKINS
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff: SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant: CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Elia Watkins v. Francisco Dervona
as 23-7250
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIA T. WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: NURSE FRANCISCO DERVONA, The Spring Grove Administration in charge of nursing, DR. ALAM, Spring Grove's CEO and DR. PATEL, Medical Doctor and the nursing dept. who continued to send Mr. Dervona over to Smith-East
Elia Watkins v. Francisco Dervona
as 23-7267
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIA T. WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: NURSE FRANCISCO DERVONA, DR. PATEL, Medical Doctor and DR. ALAM, CEO of Hospital
Marshall Watkins v. Lieutenant Seabrook
as 23-7091
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARSHALL LEON WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT SEABROOK
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
US v. Romelle Watkins
as 23-4410
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ROMELLE RAEKWON WATKINS
US v. Kenneth Watkins
as 23-4094
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH JEROME WATKINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?