Cases 1 - 10 of 275
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARVEY, JOHN MARCUM, EDGAR NEFF and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jermaine Capel v. City of Norfolk
as 24-1437
Defendant:
NORFOLK POLICE OFFICER LEPESKI GOLDSMITH, HEATHER NEWTON, Clerk of Court General District Court, J. CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE M. CAPEL
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan v. Nancy McLin
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WILDER-RHODAN, Beneficiary of Estate of George M. Rhodan
Defendant:
JUDGE NANCY CHAPMAN MCLIN, State of South Carolina, Family Court, J. GRAHAM STURGIS, JR., Attorney, VERONICA SMALLS, Attorney and others
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
US v. Scotty Simmons
as 24-4097
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SCOTTY ORLANDO SIMMONS, a/k/a Migo
US v. David Simmons
as 24-4023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID SHANE SIMMONS, a/k/a Shane Simmons
Rowena Simmons v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
ROWENA SIMMONS, Individually, and on behalf of the Estate of Darius Gore, GARY TYSON and RAYMOND B. HINTON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER FELIX TORRES, OFFICER JOHNTA GRAY and others
Tony Forrester v. Lyn Simmons
as 23-2288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
LYN MICHELE SIMMONS, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and JARRETT CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
Randle Jackson v. Anthony Hall
as 23-2095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RANDLE JACKSON, individually and as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Dashawn Simmons
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY HOWARD HALL, CAPTAIN REESE and CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
