Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendt v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03275
Plaintiff:
Samuel Clement Wendt
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Todd Ishee, Edward Buffaloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. McVicker et al
as 5:2023ct03005
Plaintiff:
Marcel Romains Wallace
Defendant:
James McVicker, David Shaw, Antwone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2022ct03361
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Sgt. Fredrick Shaw, Corey D. Collins, Brenda J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hudson v. Shaw
as 5:2022ct03313
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Fredrick Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creech v. McVicker et al
as 5:2022ct03113
Plaintiff:
Eric Creech
Defendant:
Sheriff McVicker, Captain Shaw, A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Andrews et al
as 5:2021ct03321
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Andre Gilmore
Defendant:
Lt. Andrews, Lt. Shaw, Officer Kevin Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaw v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03188
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Plaintiff:
William Brent Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
