Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Hunt v. The Marshall Law Firm, P.A. et al
as 5:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Tia Hunt
Defendant:
The Marshall Law Firm, P.A. and The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. USA
as 5:2011cv00297
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Moses Liran Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Faison v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2010hc02264
Petitioner:
Moses Leon Faison
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMillan v. Moses Carey, Jr., et al
as 7:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
TINA MCMILLAN
Defendant:
MOSES CAREY, JR. and Employment Security Commission
Mediator:
J. Anderson Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Faison v. Lightsey
as 5:2009ct03179
Plaintiff:
Moses Leon Faison
Defendant:
Joe Lightsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Sills et al
as 5:2009ct03068
Plaintiff:
Vernon S. Bullock
Defendant:
Judy Sills, T. Walker, Horace Aycock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bannamon et al v. Iman et al
as 5:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Valparisia Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne, Wesley A. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blakeney et al v. Beck et al
as 5:2007ct03153
Plaintiff:
Roger Blakeney, Nathan Bowie, Richard Cagle and others
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Gerald Branker and Unknown Executioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
