Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCNEAL v. HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MCNEAL, JR.
Defendant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, LORILLARD LLC and HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LORILLARD LICENSING COMPANY LLC v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2017cv01051
Plaintiff:
LORILLARD LICENSING COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
MARIO LAWRENCE and NUPORTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
DEMOS v. REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC., PHILLIP MORRIS INTL, INC., LORILLARD INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FONTEM VENTURES B.V. et al v. NJOY, INC.
as 1:2015mc00021
Plaintiff:
FONTEM VENTURES B.V. and FONTEM HOLDINGS 1 B.V.
Defendant:
NJOY, INC. and VAPOR CORP.
Movant:
LOEC, INC. and LORILLARD, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY v. KAHN
as 1:2012cv01343
Plaintiff:
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Defendant:
SAQUIB KAHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY v. HAITHAM HUSSEN et al
as 1:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Defendant:
HAITHAM HUSSEN and ZTOBACCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HITE v. LORILLARD TOBACCO CO.
as 1:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
MYRON J. HITE
Defendant:
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LORILLARD LICENSING COMPANY, LLC v. KRETEK INTERNATIONAL, et al
as 1:2007cv00398
Plaintiff:
LORILLARD LICENSING COMPANY, L.L.C.
Defendant:
KRETEK INTERNATIONAL and PHILLIPS & KING INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
