Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GILES v. BNC BANCORP et al
as 1:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILES
Defendant:
BNC BANCORP , THOMAS R SLOAN , JAMES T BOLT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SMITH v. BRANDON
as 1:2013cv00606
Petitioner:
DONALD R. SMITH
Respondent:
JUDY BRANDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
TONY R. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RINEHARDT v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2009cv00316
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE P. RINEHARDT
Defendant:
SONNY BOY ROBINSON, SMITH TRUCKING, INC. and R&R SMITH PROPERTIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
RANDALL FRANKLIN SMITH and ANN R. SMITH
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2007cv00864
Plaintiff:
TAMEIKA R. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
SIMBA v. BRANCH et al
as 1:2007cv00712
Plaintiff:
YA JELANI SIMBA
Defendant:
WENDY BRANCH, DONALD G. WOOD, FREDERICK B. HUBBARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
