Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Bey v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saffore v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Banita Brandise Saffore
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States Department Of Justice, M. Dzubak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miltier v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Ronald Miltier
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Osorio-Arrellanes v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Manuel Osorio-Arrellanes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tso v. Wester et al
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
EARLSON TSO and Earslon Tso
Defendant:
RON WESTER, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claim Act - Personal Injury
Chase v. Wilson
as 3:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Richard J. Chase
Respondent:
R. Wilson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons / Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Stahmer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2021cv00605
Petitioner:
Justin Stahmer
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TSO v. WESTER et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 40, RON WESTER, Mark Bolster, Acting Warden and others
Plaintiff:
EARLSON TSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Prasad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, C. O'Brien, L. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
