Cases 111 - 120 of 1,550
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Folse v. Kanawha County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
Kanawha County Commission, Vera McCormick, Lin Tech International, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Noble et al v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
William Noble and Robert Boyd
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Chad Butler, Officer Brandon Charette and The City of Princeton, WV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The City of Huntington v. The Lifehouse, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
The City of Huntington
Defendant:
The Lifehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Folse v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Scott Damron, John Doe Code Enforcement Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
