Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Grady et al v. Wood County, West Virginia
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Grady and Kenneth S. Grady
Defendant:
Wood County, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hi-Lad, Inc. v. Colombo et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Colombo, Robert F. Tebay, David Blaire (sic) Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conley v. Paitsel et al
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
A. S. Primmer, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Dallas Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Hurt v. Tupper et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Defendant:
John R. Tupper, Marshall Richards and Benjamin R. Wood
Plaintiff:
Kayla Wills and Ronnie Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coss v. Blatt et al
as 2:2018cv01199
Defendant:
D. B. Cross, William A. Blatt and Wood County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthew Coss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVore et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James DeVore , D. D. , Michael DeVore and others
Defendant:
J. C. Wetzel, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maliki v. Schaffer et al
as 2:2016cv06112
Plaintiff:
Majed Abdullah Maliki
Defendant:
Richard Schaffer and Wood County Assessor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly et al v. Tennant et al
as 3:2016cv08981
Plaintiff:
Naomi Spencer Daly and Darrell Castle
Defendant:
Natalie Tennant and Brian Wood
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Dorrel W. Arthur
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
