Cases 31 - 40 of 126,816
Baisi v. Aldridge
as 3:2024cv00387
Respondent:
Superintendent Carl Aldridge
Petitioner:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
West v. Cutwright
as 1:2024cv00380
Respondent:
Warden Cutwright
Petitioner:
Misha C. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00376
Respondent:
R. Rokosky
Petitioner:
Chajuan McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McGlothlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00509
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Aaron McGlothlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bynum v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00507
Respondent:
Mr. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Koontz v. Biote Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00506
Defendant:
BioTE Holdings, LLC, Biote Corp., Gary S. Donovitz, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy P. Koontz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cesar v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00504
Petitioner:
Tania Cesar
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mason v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00502
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Ernest Jerome Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
