Cases 71 - 80 of 126,587
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copley v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Copley
Defendant:
Polaris Industries Inc. and Polaris Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bolton v. Corns et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tabbitha Bolton
Defendant:
Zackary David Corns
Other:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nalle v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Sean Nalle
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Correctional Officer Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hylton v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hylton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
