Cases 101 - 110 of 121
Rolex Watch USA Inc v. Pharel et al
as 3:2011mc00057
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch USA Inc
Defendant:
Jean D Pharel, Deandra McKnight, Unknown Websites 1-10 and others
Napoleon T. Annan Yartey v. Montgomery Board of Education
as 10-2441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAPOLEON T. ANNAN YARTEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY BOARD OF EDUCATION, The President, PATRICIA O'NEILL, CHRISTOPHER S. BARCLAY and others
Tipler v. Exmovere Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00853
Plaintiff:
Anita C. Tipler
Defendant:
Exmovere Holdings, Inc. , David Bychkov , Cheyenne Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palmetto Gold Buying Service v. Big Thyme Enterprise
as 10-208
Petitioner:
PALMETTO GOLD BUYING SERVICE, Inc., GRETA RICHMAN and JOHN DOES, 1 - 10
Respondent:
BIG THYME ENTERPRISES, Inc., Individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yartey v. Montgomery Board of Education et al
as 8:2010cv01384
Plaintiff:
Napoleon T. Annan Yartey
Defendant:
Montgomery Board of Education , Patricia O'Niell , Christopher S. Barclay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mykal Ryan v. Lee Quick
as 10-1427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYKAL S. RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE M. QUICK and LEE M. QUICK, P.C.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc v. Palmetto Gold Buying Service Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Palmetto Gold Buying Service Inc , Greta Richman and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
