Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Edy Oliverez-Jiminez
as 20-308
Petitioner:
In re: EDY OLIVEREZ-JIMINEZ, a/k/a Daniel, a/k/a FNU LNU, a/k/a Erasmo, a/k/a Ulysses, a/k/a Jesus
Frederick Banks v. Republic of Sudan
as 20-6618
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MAYA ENERGY and others
Petitioner:
R. KELLY, SIX HIGH SCHOOLERS, in Gary, Indiana, GLEN JONES, Pinaca, NV home and car bomber and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS, next friend thereto
Joe Sholtz v. April Stroupe
as 19-7262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. SHOLTZ
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL GROUP and BUNCOMBE COUNTY JAIL
Defendant / Appellee:
APRIL STROUPE, LPN CSC, at Southeast Correctional Medical Group and FNU LNU, Executive at Southeast Correctional Medical Group
In re: Receiver for Scott A Kohn and Future Income Payments LLC
as 6:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Future Income Payments LLC and Scott A Kohn
Receiver:
Beattie B Ashmore
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
David Valencia
Intervenor:
Shurwest LLC and Robert G. Rikard
Petitioner:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
In re: Edy Oliverez-Jiminez
as 16-9914
Movant:
In re: EDY OLIVEREZ-JIMINEZ, a/k/a Daniel, a/k/a FNU LNU, a/k/a Erasmo, a/k/a Ulysses, a/k/a Jesus
:
Robert Newton v. Ray Mabus
as 15-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY MABUS, Secretary of Navy, STACY LYNN SHOOK, BRYAN BEARDSLEY and others
Newton v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Robert Newton
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Stacy Lynn Shook, Bryan Beardsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
US v. Armando Medina
as 12-4232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARMANDO GONZALEZ MEDINA, a/k/a Pablito, a/k/a FNU LNU
US v. Edy Oliverez-Jiminez
as 12-4204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDY OLIVEREZ-JIMINEZ, a/k/a Daniel, a/k/a FNU LNU, a/k/a Erasmo, a/k/a Ulysses, a/k/a Jesus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
