Cases 1 - 10 of 657
US v. Christopher Arthur
as 24-4306
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CLARK ARTHUR
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Koby Chavez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clark v. Kendall, III
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Clark
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 23-6934
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv04586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
