Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 134,750
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff: Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant: Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Barton Greene
as 24-6544
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BARTON STUART GREENE
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Brian Hamlet v. Doug Irvin
as 24-1522
Plaintiff: BRIAN LEON HAMLET
Defendant: DOUG A. IRVIN, VANNESSA DUNCAN and TRAVIS CASSELL
Dingle v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner: Donte Lamont Dingle
Respondent: USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ong v. Scruggs
as 1:2024cv01662
Petitioner: Lye H. Ong
Respondent: Carolyn J. Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01663
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Geer v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff: Anthony J. Geer
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff: Demiqou Wilson
Defendant: John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?