Cases 31 - 40 of 10,630
Montgomery v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Paul Montgomery
Defendant:
Linda Reed, Judge George Hill, Assist. Prosecutor Scott Durig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
O'Hara v. Bayliss
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Emmanuel O'Hara
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Joseph Nofflett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Marshall Luther Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Beau B. Brindley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baisi v. Bleavins et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Cpl. John Bleavins, Lt. James Irwin, Western Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Boggs and Luke Tyler Holstein
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
