Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Evolved Karomac Vision Corporation v. Majority Holdings International B.T., LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Majority Holdings International B.T., LLC, Timothy R. King, Johnny Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Evolved Karomac Vision Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
King et al v. Wellin
as 2:2016cv02658
Plaintiff:
Richard B King and Marjorie W King
Defendant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_claimant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_defendant:
Marjorie W King and Richard B King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Wellin
as 2:2016cv02659
Plaintiff:
Richard B King
Defendant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_claimant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_defendant:
Richard B King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Wellin
as 2:2016cv02660
Plaintiff:
Richard B King and Marjorie W King
Defendant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_claimant:
Wendy Wellin
Counter_defendant:
Marjorie W King and Richard B King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil King, Jr. v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL D. B. KING, JR., CECILIA KING GRANT, CHARLENE KING PERDUE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
King et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Corporation, NB
as 1:2012cv01230
Plaintiff:
Cecil D.B. King, Jr. , Cecilia King Gantt , Charlene King Perdue and others
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Corporation, NB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Negotiable Instrument
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Greenwood et al
as 1:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
G. Gordon Greenwood, W. Edward Anderson, Steven D. Cogburn and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Banks v. Library of Congress Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2010cv01986
Plaintiff:
Bruce Rashard Banks
Defendant:
Library of Congress Federal Credit Union, Debbie Morris and Marsha L. King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
