Land Condemnation Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Defendant: .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217, 2009 DRR-ETS LLC, ETS Maryland, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2028 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, MD 21217 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK), National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Defendant: Betty Ward, WMC Mortgage Corp., Draper & Goldberg, PLLC a/k/a Draper& Goldberg, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant: Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Banks et al v. City of Suffolk, Virginia
as 2:2021cv00568
Plaintiff: Allen Banks, Valerie Gallashaw and the real propery known as Tax Parcel No.: 34(H)4E11A
Defendant: The City of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. 331,043 Square Feet (7.5997 Acres) of Land, More or Less, Situate in Landover, Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv02163
Defendant: PRINCE GEORGES DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, A MARYLAND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION, 331,043 SQUARE FEET (7.5997 ACRES) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN LANDOVER, PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND; and others
Plaintiff: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00391
Petitioner: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and Baltimore City Department of Housing and Community Development
Respondent: Loretta E. Davis, Midfirst Bank and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 93.48 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Putnam and Wirt Counties, West Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00042
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant: 93.48 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Putnam and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Marilyn D. Ramey , Town of Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 169.19 acres of land, more or less, in Doddridge, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties, West Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00008
Defendant: Jack J. Cunningham, Jerry Dane Jobes, Henry E. Kelley, II and others
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC v. 2.474 Acres et al
as 6:2017cv00861
Plaintiff: Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC
Defendant: 2.474 Acres, Charles P Roark, Adair R Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?