Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Linwood Haskins, Sr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINWOOD SYLVESTER HASKINS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement, COREY L. POINDEXTER, Assistant Attorney General III, TONY NELSON, District Manager - Central Virginia Office and others
United States of America Estate of Miller v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv03165
Plaintiff:
United States of America Estate of Miller
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Governor Larry Hogan, Office of the Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rankine v. Page et al
as 5:2020cv00049
Defendant:
ING Bank, Plaintiffs of Terrorist Attack on September 11, 2001, Hugh Davis North and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Rankine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Consumer Protection Division Office of the Maryland Attorney General v. Virginia College, LLC
as 1:2019cv02338
Defendant:
VIRGINIA COLLEGE, LLC
Plaintiff:
Consumer Protection Division office of the Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tulk v. The Democratic National Party et al
as 2:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of West Virginia ex rel. v. CVS Pharmacy, Incorporated
as 11-1251
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant:
CVS PHARMACY, INCORPORATED, a Rhode Island Corporation, KMART HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, THE KROGER COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation and others
State of North Carolina, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General et al v. Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General and Elaine F. Marshall, Secretary of State
Defendant:
Corporate Services, Inc. and Selwyn J. Monarch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
