Cases 31 - 40 of 1,475
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department and Buckhannon Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Preece et al
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Trey Daniel
Defendant:
Deborah L. Preece, Rick Thompson, Billy Dell Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons-Price v. United States Probation Office of Wheeling, WV (et al.)
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lyons-Price
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of Wheeling, WV (et al.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wickline et al v. Cumberledge et al
as 2:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jason Wickline and Shanna Wickline
Defendant:
Cpl. T. J. Cumberledge, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons-Price v. Boring
as 5:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lyons-Price
Defendant:
Kylee Boring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hope Community Church v. The Honorable Mac Warner
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hope Community Church
Defendant:
The Honorable Mac Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 2:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Mullens et al
as 1:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Gregory Saunders
Defendant:
James E. Mullens, Ofc. D. M. Pertee, Ofc. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kruk v. Hale
as 2:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Brandi Kruk
Defendant:
Bobby R. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slone et al v. Racer et al
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Opal R. Slone and The Estate of Jacquline Hudson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Racer, Cabell County Sheriff's Office, Chuck Zerkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
