Cases 91 - 100 of 336
Bad Company Inc v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Bad Company Inc
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Xu v. Nesbitt
as 1:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lihuan Xu
Defendant:
Anne Marie Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Joyce Chapman
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines, Inc., Excel Moving & Storage, Inc., Excel Moving & Storage of Greensboro, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Rite Aid
as 8:2015cv03321
Plaintiff:
Raymond Johnson
Defendant:
Rite Aid
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Smalley v. SC Electric Cooperatives Aiken County Electric
as 1:2015cv04033
Plaintiff:
Terry Mikell Smalley
Defendant:
SC Electric Cooperatives Aiken County Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Fatigati v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Cathy Fatigati
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines, Inc. and Simonik Moving & Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Interstate Commerce Act
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (PURE) v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc.
as 7:2015cv00192
Defendant:
Bekins Van Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (PURE)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
SHAW v. WHEATON WORLDWIDE MOVING, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
BYRON THOMAS SHAW, II
Defendant:
WHEATON WORLDWIDE MOVING, QUALITY MOVING SERVICE INC. and TODD'S EASY MOVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vilfrard v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis CO., LPA
as 7:2015cv00429
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Trade Commission v. The Medici Portfolio, LLC
as 8:2015cv02285
Petitioner:
Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
The Medici Portfolio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
