Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Arnold McCartney v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7197
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARNOLD WAYNE MCCARTNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and Jail
Don Galloway v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7046
Petitioner / Appellant:
DON GARFIELD GALLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and R. S. MUTTER, Superintendent
Nicholas Robey v. Donald Ames
as 23-6790
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS ROBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Brandon Saul v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6769
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON S. SAUL
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mt. Olive Complex
Dennis Rydbom v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6351
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS RYDBOM
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DONNIE AMES, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Harry Barron v. Donald Ames
as 22-7144
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY A. BARRON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent, Mt. Olive, WV
Eddricco Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6487
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDRICCO LI'SHAUN BROWN-BEY, In Propria Persona Sui Juris Being restrained under the Ex Relatione: other
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MILTON OLIVER FLETCHER, Prosecutor, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS and others
Georgie Jr v. Mount Olive Correctional Complex
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Cornell Maurice Georgie Jr
Respondent:
Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
Eddricco L. Brown-Bey
Respondent:
North Carolina, State of, Milton Oliver Fletcher, North Carolina Division of Adult Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver v. Barnes
as 1:2021cv00462
Respondent:
Warden N. Barnes
Petitioner:
Troy Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
