General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Smith v. Dismas Charities et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv10749
Petitioner: James Smith
Respondent: Dismas Charities and U. S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darris Ware v. Attorney General of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7135
Petitioner - Appellant: DARRIS ALARIC WARE
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and JOHN WOLFE, Warden
Respondent - None: JAMES SMITH, Warden
Dean Prue, Jr. v. James Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6609
Petitioner - Appellant: DEAN L. PRUE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES SMITH, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Darryl Taylor v. James Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7125
Petitioner - Appellant: DARRYL TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES SMITH, Warden and DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Ware v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01160
Petitioner: Darris Alaric Ware
Respondent: James Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00803
Petitioner: Raymond Banks
Respondent: James Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prue v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00665
Petitioner: Dean L. Prue, Jr.
Respondent: James Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00578
Petitioner: Byron M. Stewart
Respondent: James Smith and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?