Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDowell v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00569
Petitioner:
Roderick W. McDowell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lyvers v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Kashajuan Lyvers
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christopher McGee v. C. Maruka
as 23-6344
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MCGEE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN C. MARUKA, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell
Capers v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Christopher Capers
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Barrington Miller
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gilbert v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Wallace D. Gilbert
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morales v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00177
Petitioner:
Ramon Morales
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
