Cases 1 - 10 of 1,131
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Marable, Jr. v. Mecklenburg Circuit Court
as 24-6591
Petitioner:
WILLIAM I. MARABLE, JR.
Respondent:
MECKLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Derek Sprouse v. Virginia Director of Prisons
as 24-6583
Petitioner:
DEREK SPROUSE
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, Department of Corrections
Britney Bates v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6431
Petitioner:
BRITNEY ODELL BATES
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Schuppan v. Beth Cabell
as 24-6329
Petitioner:
GEORGE ZACHARY SCHUPPAN
Respondent:
BETH CABELL, Warden, Sussex II State Prison and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner:
SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6272
Petitioner:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
McClain v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv01322
Petitioner:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
