Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Palmer v. City of Easley et al
as 8:2018cv01133
Plaintiff:
Daniel C Palmer
Defendant:
City of Easley, Brandon Liner, Chris Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Randall
as 1:2017cv01310
Plaintiff:
Latabus Lemont Mann
Defendant:
Jack T Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Smith
as 1:2017cv01038
Plaintiff:
Latabus L. Mann
Defendant:
William C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Vaulter
as 1:2017cv00930
Plaintiff:
Latabus Lemont Mann
Defendant:
Rebecca Vaulter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tashawn Thorne v. Officer Wesley
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAWN QWANTREAL THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY, Piedmont Correctional Officer, OFFICER SHERWIN, Piedmont Regional Jail, OFFICER BOOKER, Piedmont Regional Jail Officer and others
Defendant:
MS. BOWEN, Mental Health, MS. L. SMITH, Medical Nurse, MRS. SERGEANT TISDALE, Grievance Coordinator and others
Jimmy Bowman v. J.T. Mann
as 16-7485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY BOWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. T. MANN, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department and DET. BRYANT, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department
Thorne v. Sherwin et al
as 1:2016cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Defendant:
Officer Sherwin, Officer Wesley, Officer Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Sherwin et al
as 5:2016ct03181
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Defendant:
Officer Sherwin, Officer Wesley, Officer Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Blunt et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Petitioner:
Joseph Mann
Respondent:
Officer Blunt, Officer Gaskins, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mosby v. Harper et al
as 5:2015ct03233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Julie Harper, Arron Johnson, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
