Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Allen v. Sled Agency, S.C. et al
as 3:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Allen
Defendant:
Sled Agency, S.C., Lexington County Sheriff's Department, Sowards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Cox v. Duke Energy
as 16-6625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. COX, Personal Representative for the estate of Robin G. Fleming
Plaintiff:
ROBIN G. FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, J. BYRD, Darlington County Sheriff, JOYCE C. EVERETT and others
Caulder v. DPS et al
as 5:2016ct03050
Plaintiff:
Jon Casey Caulder
Defendant:
DPS, MVCI and Duke Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others
Kevin Harbin v. South Carolina DOC
as 15-6555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. HARBIN, a/k/a Kevin Habin
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MCBETH, ROBERT HUTTO, JOHN H. HART and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director, JOHN H. CARMICHAEL, JR., Deputy Director and others
Watson v. Land et al
as 5:2015ct03062
Plaintiff:
Larry Watson
Defendant:
Eurgia Land, James Vaughn, Ricky Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Hembree et al
as 4:2014cv04889
Plaintiff:
Michel Andre Dukes, Sr
Defendant:
J Gregory Hembree, George H Debusk, Jr and James E Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baines v. Clarke et al
as 3:2014cv00616
Petitioner:
Artis Baines
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Lt. Dukes and Y. Wyche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. McMahon et al
as 5:2014ct03100
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duke Howell
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, William E. Owen, Does 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Grant et al
as 5:2014ct03072
Plaintiff:
Roger Stevenson
Defendant:
Cy A. Grant, W. Clark Everett, Thomas D. Haigwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
