Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Layne v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2012cv00189
Conmed:
Dr. Ali
Defendant:
Kelley Jenkins
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Allan Layne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvin Moody v. Todd Perseghin
as 12-6133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985
Defendant:
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and CLARENCE N. JENKINS
Moody v. Kelley et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Marvin J Moody
Defendant:
Caitlin R. Kelley and Todd B Perseghin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Fairmont City Police Department et al
as 5:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Saladine Q. Richardson
Defendant:
Fairmont City Police Department, Douglas E. Yost, John Bennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Phipps et al
as 7:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Greene
Defendant:
James Phipps, Bradley Finch, Joshai Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myron Kelley v. J. Whitlark
as 08-8378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRON KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MARCUS WHITLARK and PAUL C. BALLOU, all in
Kelley v. Whitlark et al
as 3:2008cv02801
Plaintiff:
Myron Kelley
Defendant:
J Marcus Whitlark and Paul C Ballou
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jerome West v. D. Braxton
as 08-6340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME J. WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional Center, A. KELLEY HARRISON and DOCTOR MOBASHAR
Mills v. Greenville, County of et al
as 0:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnny L Mills
Defendant:
Greenville, County of, Greenville City of, Robert Aerail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
West v. Braxton et al
as 7:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. West
Defendant:
D. A. Braxton, A. Kelley Harrison and Naseer Mobashar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
