Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Gaskins v. Back et al
as 7:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
John C. Gaskins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Back, Major Stokes and Captain Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Cynthia J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammed Chhipa v. Chief Gordon
as 24-6051
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED CHHIPA
Defendant:
CHIEF GORDON, SERGEANT JUAREZ, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Chhipo v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipo
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Chief Gordon, Director Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhipa v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipa
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Chief Gordon and Captain Lytle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Hurwitz et al
as 6:2023cv06927
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Hugh J Hurwitz, Director J Gordon and Jack J Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Gordon v. Roberts et al
as 7:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Deandre Jaquan Gordon
Defendant:
C/O Roberts, Warden Jeffery C. Artrip, A.W. James Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhipa v. Gordon et al
as 3:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Chhipa
Defendant:
Chief Gordon, Sgt. Juarez, Deputy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shook et al v. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources et al
as 4:2023cv05027
Plaintiff:
Dana Shook and Lewis Bennett
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office, Kyle Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Vega v. Canestraro et al
as 3:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega
Defendant:
Joseph Canestraro, Bryan Gaus, Eric Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
