Cases 1 - 10 of 22
John Hardee v. Christopher Walz
as 23-6966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN T. HARDEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS WALZ, Superintendent, in individual and official capacity, FELICIA M. COWAN, Assistant Superintendent, in individual and official capacity, WINSTON BHAGIRATH, Captain, in individual and official capacity and others
Bunn v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01553
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Bunn, Jr.
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., T. Jones, Z. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunn v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv01841
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L Bunn, Jr.
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Officer M. Jobe, PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Defendant:
T. Jones, Sergeant E. Strawderman, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
Travon Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lewis v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Markese Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McBride
as 3:2020cv04063
Defendant:
Jeanette W McBride
Plaintiff:
Clayton T Jones, Clayton Thomas Jones and Clayton Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Harold Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee, Bryan Herrion, Cedric Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Odom
as 3:2019cv03326
Defendant:
Officer Chris E Odom
Plaintiff:
Clayton T Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Hughes et al
as 7:2019cv00259
Defendant:
T. Jones, Hawkins, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Kemo Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hargrove
as 1:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
JaQuan T. Jones
Defendant:
George Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
