Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Matherly v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00935
Defendant: Officer Renada Tillery, Nurse Wytasha Howell, Officer Chicarla Sykes and others
Plaintiff: Administrator Daniel Thomas Matherly and Daniel Thomas Matherly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00751
Defendant: Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail
Plaintiff: Herman Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Kalinski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00194
Plaintiff: Gregory D. Tillery
Defendant: FNU Kalinski, FNU Johnson, FNU Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. FINK et al
as 1:2015cv00212
Plaintiff: ELLISON RAY HOLMES
Defendant: GARY L. FINK, AMY M. LEEPER, RICHARD HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Fink et al
as 5:2015ct03061
Plaintiff: Ellison Ray Holmes
Defendant: Gary L. Fink, Amy M. Leeper, Richard Hadley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Mann et al
as 5:2009ct03071
Plaintiff: Jermaine Tillery
Defendant: Charles L. Mann, Sr., Willis J. Fowler, Andrew P. Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Latham, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7673
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES BENNETT LATHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, FRED SHILLING, Director of Health Services, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Michael Star v. Gene Johnson
as 08-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL STAR
Defendant - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and RUFUS FLEMMING, Regional Director
Defendant - None: GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden of Greensville Correctional, BATTS, Assistant Warden, ANDERSON, Administrative Assistant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?