Cases 121 - 130 of 19,824
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Mickduff and Mark Andersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
DARYL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Nicholson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03110
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Locklear, Nurse P. Pierre, OIC of Seg. Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, Lt. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ivan
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Trashon Williams
Defendant:
Ivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge St. Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge St. Prison, C.O. Johnsin and C.O. Kennety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
