Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Robert Dixon v. R. Mitchell
as 08-8412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT H. DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Mountain View Correctional Institution and NURSE PRESNELL, RN, Mountain View Correctional Institution
Dixon v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2008cv00473
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Dixon
Defendant:
R. David Mitchell and Presnell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2008cv00322
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stuart Tompkins v. Department of Corrections
as 08-6875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. R. CARROLL, CHRIS BATTEN and others
Ashford v. Bennett et al
as 1:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Keith Ellis Ashford
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, David Mitchell, Mike Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2007ct03152
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, T. R. Carroll, Chris Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bennett et al
as 1:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Charles William Johnson
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, R. David Mitchell and Robert Uhren
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02293
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Foster v. Benfield et al
as 1:2007cv00237
Plaintiff:
Harold Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Benfield, Jeffery Hudskins and R. David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaver v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Arnold Warren Beaver
Defendant:
R. David Mitchell, Stacey Carpenter, Robert Urhen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
