Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Robert Foster v. Tim Riley
as 16-6654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, G. LANE, Assistant Warden Operations, SERGEANT MCMORRIS, Property Control and others
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-6340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Foster v. Riley et al
as 9:2015cv03787
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Foster
Defendant:
Tim Riley, G Lane, Sgt McMorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley
as 15-6835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Directory of the Department of Corrections, AMY SPENCER and others
Myers v. Riley et al
as 5:2015cv01000
Plaintiff:
Terence D Myers
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Gary Lane, Warden Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Riley et al
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Andrew Plummer
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Ms Powe and DHO Glidewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharar v. McKillip et al
as 8:2014cv04194
Plaintiff:
Stephan Alexander Sharar
Defendant:
Bryan McKillip and Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Tucker et al
as 9:2014cv03628
Plaintiff:
Jarode JL Witherspoon
Defendant:
BJ Tucker, Jack Ervin, Mr Jet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Riley et al
as 0:2014cv02788
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Bryan P Stirling, Amy Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisenby v. Riley et al
as 5:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr
Defendant:
Tim Riley, G Lane, Assoc. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
