Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Scarborough v. Mecullar et al
as 5:2021ct03096
Defendant:
Multiple Staff, Sgt. Mecullar, Officer Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator
as 1:2021cv00557
Defendant:
Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator, Cook Supervisor and Food Service Administrator
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 9:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Travis LaVoy Jenkins
Defendant:
Naphcare Insurance, Dismas Charities, Inc., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03041
Plaintiff:
Travis Lavoy Jenkins
Defendant:
Naphcare Insurance, Dismas Charities, Inc., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Thomas et al
as 2:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Nurse Geri Gillespie, Captain Michael Rasar and Lieutenant Tahirah Thomas
Plaintiff:
Rakish Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Thomas et al
as 9:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Nurse Geri Gillespie, Captain Michael Rasar and Lieutenant Tahirah Thomas
Plaintiff:
Rakish Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Burrs et al
as 5:2020ct03365
Defendant:
Officer J. Burrs, Sgt. Edwards and Officer Jenkins
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. BROWN
as 1:2020cv00575
Defendant:
WARDEN BROWN
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC DEWIN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWMAN v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY JAIL, B. COLE, CINDY FELTS and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE DOUGLAS BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY JENKINS, LT. RANDALL SHELTON, SURRY COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
