Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Chambers v. Warden of Alexander Correctional
as 5:2023ct03090
Plaintiff:
Eric Ramond Chambers
Defendant:
Alexander Correctional Institution, Warden of Alexander Correctional, David Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ray et al
as 5:2023ct03066
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Ray, David Randall Newman, R. Gonzolaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY MILLER and DAVID HENRY-MILLER
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., HENRY NORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNO v. SCOTT
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
DAVID MANNO
Defendant:
KEITH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Braddy et al
as 5:2023ct03002
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Doctor Braddy, Wade Walston, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manno v. Scott
as 5:2023ct03003
Plaintiff:
David Manno
Defendant:
Keith Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. McVicker et al
as 5:2023ct03005
Plaintiff:
Marcel Romains Wallace
Defendant:
James McVicker, David Shaw, Antwone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Leverton et al
as 5:2022ct03357
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Brett Leverton, David R. Newman, Caleb Ammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
