Cases 51 - 60 of 3,397
Mickens v. Henrico County Sheriff Department
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Mickens
Defendant:
Henrico County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Taylor
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin Macoy, T. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LoCascio v. Virgil et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Geno A. LoCascio
Defendant:
Sgt. Virgil, Officer Gardner, Officer Grogalucki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney v. Mangrum et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lerico Kearney
Defendant:
Mangrum and Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
