Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMann v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03164
Plaintiff:
Neal McMann
Defendant:
Wakenda Greene, Mrs. Martinez, Stephen Eddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pridgen v. Judge et al
as 5:2023ct03018
Plaintiff:
Richard Pridgen
Defendant:
Warden Cathy Judge, Assoc. Warden Tyrell Griggs, Nurse Erin Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaqun Copeland v. Jonathan Adams
as 22-7125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAQUN ORLANDO COPELAND
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN GRAY ADAMS, New Hanover County Sheriff's Department
Defendant:
ED MCMAN, New Hanover County Sheriff
Hargett v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022ct03098
Plaintiff:
James Hargett and James Edward Hargett
Defendant:
Ed McMahon and Cpl. J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargett v. New Hanover County Jail
as 5:2022ct03087
Plaintiff:
James Hargett
Defendant:
New Hanover County Jail, Ed McMahon and J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAfee v. Jasmine et al
as 5:2020ct03306
Plaintiff:
Alexander Justin McAfee
Defendant:
Nurse Jasmine, Ed Kohler and Mitchell Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Adams et al
as 5:2020ct03297
Defendant:
Ed McMan and Officer Adams
Plaintiff:
Jaqun Orlando Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Aiken Regional Medical Center et al
as 4:2020cv00817
Plaintiff:
Stanley Benton
Defendant:
Phyllis ONeill, Aiken Regional Medical Center and Ed AIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Kraft et al
as 5:2019ct03284
Defendant:
Wellpath, Sheriff Ed McMahon and J. Kraft
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
