Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ward v. Virginia Pool Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Brayden R Ward
Defendant:
Virginia Pool Services Inc., Pool Services of Virginia, LLC and Diane I Vermillion
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Torres et al v. Five Star Home Repair LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Morel Torres, Roberto Carlos Torres Torres, Edwin Bladimir Sanchez Ruan and others
Defendant:
Five Star Home Repair LLC, Poole Construction, Inc., J Poole Group and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vore v. Carolina Pool Plastering, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00429
Defendant:
William D. Deaton and Carolina Pool Plastering, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guziewski v. Total Swimming Pool Management Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Adrian Guziewski
Defendant:
Total Swimming Pool Management Inc., Barbara Kaminowitz, Howard Sklar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alston et al v. Directv Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04093
Plaintiff:
James Alston , Carnell Bullock , Mark Hilton and others
Defendant:
Directv Inc, Directv LLC and Mastec North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Graham v. Pool Cover Solutions of the Southeast LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael E Graham
Defendant:
Pool Cover Solutions of the Southeast LLC, Jonathon Windmueller and Kris Windmueller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Regan et al v. Charleston SC, City of
as 2:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Regan , Jesse Faircloth , Michael Pack and others
Defendant:
Charleston SC, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Dimitrova et al v. RSV Pools Management, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01229
Plaintiff:
Diana Dimitrova, Daniel Dimitrov, Ludmila Cekova and others
Defendant:
RSV Pools Management, Inc. and Raymond S. Vincent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
