Cases 1 - 10 of 20
H. Lundbeck A/S v. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
as 1:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant:
Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Special Tactical Services, LLC v. H & H Tool Shop, LLC
as 2:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
Special Tactical Services, LLC
Defendant:
H & H Tool Shop, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spiegel v. Pro Performance Sports, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
H. Jay Spiegel
Defendant:
Pro Performance Sports, LLC , The Sports Authority, Inc. and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Robert H. Harder Associates, Inc. v. The Seaberg Company, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00547
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Harder Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Seaberg Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Houck et al vs. Rapac, L.P. et al
as 1:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Houck and Wanda Houck
Defendant:
Rapac, L.P., Ring Corporation, EZFlow, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
PMG, Inc. v. Vestil Manufacturing Corp. et al
as 5:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
PMG, Inc.
Defendant:
Vestil Manufacturing Corp., Barco Products Company, Galeton and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
180s, Inc. et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 1:2010cv03358
Plaintiff:
180s, Inc. and 180S, LLC
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
180S, Inc. et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 1:2010cv03361
Plaintiff:
180S, Inc. and 180S, LLC
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 2:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd.
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Slack v. BON AQUA INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff:
Gary Slack
Defendant:
BON AQUA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Aqua Dyne Inc., CONSTANCE C. LOWENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
