Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JR et al v. Mancino et al
as 2:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JR and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Michele Mancino, Thomas E Aspinwall, Telegram Messenger Inc. doing business as Telegram and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act
LaPlante v. Camens et al
as 2:2021cv03919
Plaintiff:
Michele F LaPlante and Mitch LaPlante
Defendant:
Marc Camens, William Means Real Estate LLC, Preserve at Fenwick Hall Property Owners Association Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01432
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Brookfield Business Partners LP, Mary Roe and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Public Service Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Center for Advancing Innovation, Inc. v. Bahreini et al
as 8:2018cv01119
Plaintiff:
The Center for Advancing Innovation, Inc.
Defendant:
Samuel Bahreini , Jenna Baker, Alejandra Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Doe v. Roe
as 3:2017cv03000
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Roe v. Howard
as 1:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Sarah Roe
Defendant:
Linda Howard and Estate of Russell Howard
Cause Of Action: 18 USC 1595 Human Trafficking Litigation
Richardson v. William Sneider and Associates, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Victoria Richardson
Defendant:
William Sneider and Associates, LLC, Jane Roe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Roe
as 3:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Skelton v. United States Supreme Court
as 11-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES B. SKELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, on appeal of Roe vs Wade 1973 and JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., Chief Justice and Associate Justices
Doe v. Roe
as 3:2009cv02000
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
