Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Dunlap et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Counter Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cross Claimant:
Hailey Dunlap
Cross Defendant:
Samantha Martinet
Defendant:
K D (a minor), J D (a minor), K.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
K & D Property LLC et al v. State Auto Insurance Companies et al
as 1:2016cv02633
Plaintiff:
K & D Property LLC , Young Chae Kim and Yun Joo Kim
Defendant:
State Auto Insurance Companies and State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
K & D Holdings, LLC v. Equitrans, L.P.
as 15-1166
Plaintiff - Appellee:
K & D HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
EQUITRANS, L.P. and EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY
Defendant:
EQT CORPORATION, a/k/a Equitrans, Inc.
K & D Holdings, LLC v. EQT Corp.
as 5:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
K & D Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
EQT Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Edwards II et al
as 1:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Kenya T. Edwards II, K. d. E., K. m. E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Margo Hein-Muniz v. Aiken Regional Medical Center
as 12-2439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGO J. HEIN-MUNIZ, MD and PARKSIDE MEDICAL CONSULTANTS LLC, d/b/a Magnolia Medical
Defendant - Appellee:
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS INCORPORATED, UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, AIKEN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA and others
Party-in-Interest - Appellee:
ERNEST JOSEPH NAUFUL, JR.
Hein-Muniz et al v. Aiken Regional Medical Centers et al
as 1:2010cv00986
Plaintiff:
Margo J Hein-Muniz and Parkside Medical Consultants LLC
Defendant:
Aiken Regional Medical Centers , Universal Health Services Inc , Aiken Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
