Cases 1 - 10 of 1,532
F&M Investment, Inc. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
F&M Investment, Inc.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
United States Of America v. Gay
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Shawn Scott Gay
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. Pallotta II et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
J. Christopher Pallotta II and Courtney Pallotta
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Vilorio
as 8:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Orlando Vilorio
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Stephanie R. Smith
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
United States of America v. Stoots et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher S. Stoots and Michelle R. Stoots
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Seale v. United States of America
as 5:2024mc00006
Petitioner:
Justin Seale
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
