Cases 11 - 20 of 22
John Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 20-7565
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, PRISON KEEPER BRIAN P. STIRLING, SUSAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Larry Williams v. Scott Lewis
as 20-6813
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM T. BRADBURN, FELICIA OGUNSILE, LANE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Supreme Ackbar v. Christopher Monaco
as 20-6872
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, C. EARLY, RIVERA LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary
Linwood Duffie v. Superintendent of Maury Corr.
as 19-7848
Petitioner / Appellant:
LINWOOD EARL DUFFIE, a/k/a Adula Wali Allah
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT OF MAURY CORR. INST.
Heather Hoffman v. Stephanie Smart-Gittings
as 19-2058
Defendant:
STAFF SERGEANT ERIC CALENDINE, CHIEF DEPUTY MICHAEL HATFIELD, P. J. TANNER, Beaufort County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T, CATHERINE E. HEIGEL, Director, SC Department of Health and Environmental Control, STEPHANIE SMART-GITTINGS, Circuit Defender, Beaufort County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER C. HOFFMAN
Heather Hoffman v. P. Tanner
as 19-1095
Defendant / Appellee:
J. EDWARD ALLEN, Beaufort County Coroner, ERIC CALENDINE, P. J. TANNER, Beaufort County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER C. HOFFMAN
In Re Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Duffy
as 2:2016mc00094
Petitioner:
Lawyer Disciplinary Board
Respondent:
Kevin C. Duffy
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
US v. Dante Duffy
as 14-4275
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANTE XAVIA DUFFY
Catherine Alexander v. Glut Food Coop
as 13-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHERINE ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
GLUT FOOD COOP, CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, JAIME MOORBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.