Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 261 - 270 of 89,300
SAM RESTAURANTS, INC. v. UNITED SUGAR PRODUCERS & REFINERS COOPERATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Defendant: UNITED SUGAR PRODUCERS & REFINERS COOPERATIVE, UNITED SUGARS CORPORATION, AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SAM RESTAURANTS, INC on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as CAROLINA'S DINER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
SALOMON & LUDWIN, LLC v. WINTERS et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff: SALOMON & LUDWIN, LLC
Defendant: JEREMIAH WINTERS, CATHERINE ATWOOD, JENNIFER THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ndjado Hyambe Ya Shako v. Wagner
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff: Jean Raphael Ndjado Hyambe Ya Shako
Defendant: Michael Brett Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc. v. Orion Solutions, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00354
Plaintiff: Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Orion Solutions, LLC and Russell (Shawn) Rakes
Walther Arriaza-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1501
Petitioner: WALTHER ARRIAZA-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Walter Alexy Arriaza-Ramirez
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Wayne Prince
as 24-4296
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WAYNE PRINCE, a/k/a Taz
US v. Anthony Spencer
as 24-4298
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTHONY P. SPENCER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?