Cases 21 - 30 of 81
ZOU et al v. MARKET AMERICA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DOLLY KUO, MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., LIU LUCY HONG and others
Plaintiff:
OLLIE LAN, JINHUA ZOU, CHUANJIE YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARKET AMERICA, INC. et al v. ZOU et al
as 1:2019cv00315
Petitioner:
STEVE ASHLEY, PATRICK HSIEH, ALICE HSIEH and others
Respondent:
JINHUA ZOU, YU XIA LU, OLLIE LAN and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Franchi v. Paragon Commercial Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Paragon Commercial Corporation, Paragon Commercial Bank, Howard Jung and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Evans v. Hodge
as 3:2017mc00151
Petitioner:
James Anthony Evans
Respondent:
Sharon Hodge
Freeborn v. MaxPoint Interactive, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Anthony Freeborn
Defendant:
MaxPoint Interactive, Inc., Joseph Epperson, Kevin Dulsky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Federal Trade Commission v. ACDI Group, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Anthony Swatsworth, ACDI Group, LLC and Solutions to Portfolios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
LOMAX et al v. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
JONNIE LOMAX and HAROLD LOMAX
Defendant:
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC., TIM E BENTSEN, CHARLES A BLIXT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
GRAHAM v. BENTSEN, et al
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRAHAM
Defendant:
TIM E. BENTSEN , CHARLES A BLIXT , LYNN CRUMP-CAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Anozia v. Lynch, et al
as 5:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Anozia
Defendant:
Loretta E. Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
