Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Construction Industry Health and Welfare Trust, Bricklayers Local Union No. 9 Group et al v. Arthur et al
as 2:2008mc00021
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Health and Welfare Trust, Bricklayers Local Union No. 9 Group and Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund
Defendant:
Philip G. Arthur and Joshua A. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Pension Fund
as 3:2008mc00013
Plaintiff:
Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Pension Fund, Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Pension Fund, Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Auto Resources Group, Auto Resources Group of Maryland, Auto Rail Services of Maryland, Inc. and others
FREIGHT DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 557, ETC., ET AL v. AUTO RESOURCES GROUP, et al
as 1:2007mc00041
Plaintiff:
FREIGHT DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 557, ETC., ET AL
Defendant:
AUTO RESOURCES GROUP, et al
Employee Pension Plan and Trust for Local Union 52, etc. et al v. MVP, Inc.
as 8:2007mc00215
Plaintiff:
Employee Pension Plan and Trust for Local Union 52, etc. and Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 52, etc.
Defendant:
MVP, Inc.
Construction Industry Health and Welfare Trust, Bricklayers Local Union No. 9 Group v. McCormick Tile
as 3:2007mc00056
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Health and Welfare Trust, Bricklayers Local Union No. 9 Group
Defendant:
McCormick Tile
Mountain State Construction Co. Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 132, AFL-CIO
as 2:1972cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mountain State Construction Co. Inc.
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 132, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. ยง 9999
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
